Understanding When and How a Child’s Preference Impacts Custody Decisions
One of the most common questions in California custody cases—especially those involving teens or preteens—is whether a child can choose which parent they want to live with. Parents often hear from their children, “I want to live with Mom” or “I want to stay with Dad,” and wonder how much weight the court gives to those preferences.
Under California law, a child’s preference does matter, but it is not the deciding factor. Family court judges are obligated to act in the best interest of the child, and while a child’s voice is part of that determination, it is not the final word. Judges consider a range of factors, including maturity, reasoning, potential coercion, emotional ties, and the child’s safety and stability.
This article unpacks California law on this issue, including what the law says about child preference, how and when children are heard in court, and what parents should do (and not do) when their child expresses a desire to live primarily with one parent.
California Family Code §3042: The Right to Be Heard
The key legal authority on child preference in custody matters is Family Code §3042. This section allows a child to express their custodial preference to the court if the child is of sufficient age and capacity to form an intelligent preference.
Under the statute:
-
If the child is 14 years old or older, the court must allow the child to testify or express a preference unless the judge finds that doing so is not in the child’s best interest.
-
If the child is under 14, the court may consider the child’s wishes, but it is up to the judge to determine whether the child is mature enough to have meaningful input.
This doesn’t mean the child gets to choose. It means the child has a right to be heard, and the judge must weigh their opinion along with all the other custody factors.
Can a 14-Year-Old Choose Where to Live?
A common myth is that once a child turns 14, they have the power to choose which parent they live with. This is false.
At 14, the child has the right to have their preference considered. But it’s still the judge—not the child—who makes the decision. Judges often respect the wishes of older children, particularly when the child articulates logical, emotionally grounded reasons. However, if the child’s preference is based on:
-
Leniency or lack of rules
-
Influence or pressure from one parent
- A desire to avoid discipline or school attendance
- Misunderstanding of the court process
…the judge may disregard the preference entirely or question its authenticity.
In addition, judges are reluctant to “reward” a parent who has manipulated or alienated a child to create a favorable preference. If the court suspects coaching, parental alienation, or undue influence, the child’s stated wishes may not carry much weight.
How Does a Child Express Their Preference?
There are several ways a child’s preference can be presented in court, depending on age, maturity, and the sensitivity of the case:
1. In-Camera Interview With the Judge
The child may speak directly to the judge in chambers (not in open court), with a court reporter present. Sometimes attorneys are excluded to reduce pressure on the child. This option is common for older teens.
2. Through a Minor’s Counsel
If appointed, minor’s counsel serves as the child’s independent attorney. They gather the child’s input confidentially and make recommendations to the court.
3. Via a Custody Evaluator or 730 Evaluation
In high-conflict cases, a custody evaluation may be ordered. Evaluators meet with the child and assess their preference, demeanor, and any potential coaching.
4. Through Family Court Services (FCS) Mediation
In San Diego and many California counties, the child may meet with a Family Court Services mediator as part of the custody recommendation process.
Courts rarely allow children to testify in open court. Judges are deeply concerned with protecting children from trauma or being forced to “choose sides.”
What Factors Influence Whether a Judge Follows the Child’s Preference?
When evaluating a child’s stated preference, the court considers:
- Age and maturity: Is the child old enough and emotionally mature enough to make a sound judgment?
- Reasoning: Are the child’s reasons logical and emotionally grounded, or are they impulsive or superficial?
- Stability: Will the child have more educational, emotional, or social stability in one home over the other?
- Parental influence: Is there evidence that one parent is influencing or coercing the child?
- Sibling relationships: If siblings are involved, will the decision affect their bond?
- Best interest of the child: This is the overarching standard, and all preferences are measured against it.
The judge’s job is to filter the child’s voice through the lens of safety, development, and long-term well-being—not to give in to temporary whims or family politics.
What Happens If Parents Disagree With the Child’s Choice?
When one parent agrees with the child’s preference and the other does not, the court will still examine all relevant factors. No parent “wins” custody simply because the child favors them.
If the court believes the preference is genuine and aligns with the child’s best interest, the parenting plan may be adjusted. This might include:
- Shifting primary physical custody
- Increasing visitation with the preferred parent
- Modifying the parenting time schedule to match the child’s school or activity needs
- Revisiting transportation and holiday arrangements
If the judge rejects the preference, they must explain why on the record, particularly when the child is over 14.
The Risks of Parental Manipulation
It is critically important that parents do not pressure or coach a child to state a preference. California courts are skilled at identifying when a child’s wishes are the product of manipulation, alienation, or parental gatekeeping.
If the court determines that a parent has:
- Encouraged the child to reject the other parent
- Withheld visitation or information
- Exposed the child to negative talk about the other parent
- Used emotional manipulation or guilt
…the manipulating parent may lose custody, face sanctions, or be required to engage in reunification counseling. In extreme cases, custody may be switched entirely to the other parent.
Let your child have their own voice. Let them love both parents. Do not involve them in litigation strategy.
What Should Parents Do If a Child Expresses a Preference?
If your child says they want to live with you—or with the other parent—resist the urge to react emotionally. Instead:
- Stay calm and ask why
- Avoid criticizing the other parent
- Take notes on what your child says and how they express it
- Talk to your attorney before bringing it up in court
- Consider therapy or counseling if the child seems conflicted or stressed
You may choose to file a Request for Order (RFO) asking the court to consider the child’s input. Depending on the child’s age, this could trigger a Family Court Services interview or even a 730 evaluation.
Does the Child’s Preference Affect Legal Custody Too?
Legal custody involves decision-making authority on medical, educational, and other major life issues. A child’s preference generally affects physical custody (where the child lives), not legal custody.
However, if a child has strong views about their schooling, religious upbringing, or medical choices, those views may indirectly influence legal custody decisions. For example, if one parent is more supportive of a child’s learning disability or gender identity, the court may assign them tie-breaking authority in that domain.
Modifying Custody Based on a Child’s Preference
If your child has expressed a clear, mature desire to change the custody arrangement, you can file a modification request. The court will require you to show that there has been a material change in circumstances and that the proposed modification is in the child’s best interest.
A child’s preference alone does not justify a custody change. It must be backed by facts showing that the new arrangement would serve the child’s needs better than the current one.
Courts are more likely to approve modifications based on preference when:
- The child is over 14
- The preference is consistent and emotionally grounded
- The proposed change would improve educational, emotional, or familial stability
- The child is not being coached or manipulated
Final Thoughts
While children in California do not have the final say in custody matters, their voices do matter—especially as they grow older. Judges are careful to listen, investigate, and weigh those preferences within the broader context of the child’s well-being.
If your child has expressed a desire to change where they live, it’s important to handle the situation with care, strategy, and legal guidance. That voice can be powerful, but only when it’s genuine, unpressured, and framed within a solid custody strategy.
At Minella Law Group, we understand how sensitive these cases can be. We work with parents to protect their relationships, respond to evolving child needs, and ensure the court hears what matters most—without compromising your case.
Your Child’s Voice Matters. So Does Your Legal Strategy.
If your child wants to change custody or you’re facing a preference issue in court, we can help you navigate the legal, emotional, and strategic considerations. Let our family law team in San Diego advocate for you and your child’s best future.
📞 Call Minella Law Group today at 619-289-7948 to schedule a confidential consultation with one of our family law specialists. We’ll listen to your concerns, assess the situation, and create a clear strategy tailored to your goals.
📝 Prefer email? Fill out our online contact form and a member of our legal team will get in touch with you promptly.
Let’s work together to ensure your child’s voice is heard—and protected.
