Category

Family Law Blog

In Child Custody & Visitation, Domestic Violence Restraining Orders

Using Domestic Violence Restraining Orders to Protect Custody Rights in California

paper with a legal seal at the top and words below

How DVROs Can Secure Safety and Legal Custody for Survivors and Their Children

In California family law, few tools are more powerful—or more urgent—than a Domestic Violence Restraining Order (DVRO). When one parent has been subjected to abuse or threats of harm, a DVRO can provide immediate protection while also shaping the long-term outcome of a custody case. These orders are not only about personal safety—they are often the key to preserving parental rights, securing legal and physical custody, and breaking the cycle of trauma for children.

Many parents facing domestic violence worry about how to protect themselves and their children without escalating the conflict or risking retaliation. Others may be unsure whether their experiences “count” as abuse under the law. California’s family courts take domestic violence seriously—and when used correctly, a DVRO can help you build a strong foundation for custody and co-parenting decisions rooted in safety and stability.

This article explains what a Domestic Violence Restraining Order is, who can get one, how it affects custody, and what parents need to know when seeking or responding to one in family court.

What Is a Domestic Violence Restraining Order?

A DVRO is a court order that protects a person from abuse, threats, harassment, or violence by someone they have a close relationship with—such as a spouse, partner, co-parent, or family member. It can be requested as part of a family law case (like a divorce or custody action) or on its own.

California defines “domestic violence” broadly under the Domestic Violence Prevention Act (DVPA). Abuse includes:

  • Physical violence or attempts to harm

  • Sexual assault
  • Threats of violence
  • Emotional abuse or coercive control
  • Harassment or stalking
  • Destruction of personal property
  • Disturbing the peace of the protected party

Importantly, disturbing the peace includes patterns of controlling, intimidating, or isolating behavior—even when no physical violence is present. This broad definition ensures survivors are not excluded simply because they didn’t report bruises or broken bones.

Who Can File for a DVRO?

You can seek a DVRO if the person you are seeking protection from is:

  • Your spouse or former spouse
  • Someone you live with or used to live with
  • Someone you have dated or had a romantic relationship with
  • A co-parent (even if never married)

  • A close family member (like a sibling, in-law, or parent)

You can also request a DVRO on behalf of your children if they are being directly abused or exposed to abuse in the home.

What Does a DVRO Do?

A Domestic Violence Restraining Order can include a wide range of protections, such as:

  • Stay-away orders (requiring the restrained person to stay a set distance away from you, your children, your home, your workplace, and their school)
  • No-contact orders (prohibiting calls, texts, emails, or other forms of communication)
  • Exclusive use of the family home (forcing the abuser to move out)
  • Custody and visitation orders
  • Firearm restrictions
  • Child support or spousal support orders
  • Orders to attend batterer’s intervention or counseling

DVROs can last for up to five years, and may be renewed permanently. A temporary restraining order (TRO) is often granted first, usually without a full hearing, and is later followed by a more formal evidentiary hearing where both sides can present evidence.

How Does a DVRO Affect Custody?

This is where the impact of a DVRO becomes especially significant. California Family Code §3044 creates a rebuttable presumption that a parent who has committed domestic violence should not have sole or joint custody of their child.

In practical terms, if you obtain a DVRO against your child’s other parent, the court will assume they are not fit to share custody unless they can prove otherwise. The court must prioritize the safety of the child and the protective parent over shared parenting arrangements.

This legal presumption shifts the burden onto the restrained parent, who must demonstrate:

  • They have completed a batterer’s intervention program (if applicable)
  • They are not a risk to the child or co-parent
  • Shared custody is in the best interest of the child
  • They have complied with the order and demonstrated change

Until then, the court may limit them to supervised visitation, no visitation, or restricted parenting time. In some cases, visitation may be suspended altogether.

Can You File for Custody and a DVRO Together?

Yes. In fact, it is often strategically advisable to do so. When you file a DVRO request, you can also ask for temporary child custody orders and exclusive control of the home. These requests are often granted on an emergency basis pending the full hearing.

By combining your custody request with your restraining order, you can:

  • Prevent your abuser from removing the child
  • Create immediate structure and predictability for the child
  • Establish yourself as the primary parent early in the case
  • Set the tone for later custody evaluations or mediations

California law empowers the court to make temporary custody orders as part of the DVRO process, and these orders can later become permanent in the final custody judgment.

What Evidence Do You Need?

To obtain a DVRO, you must show that abuse occurred—not just that you were uncomfortable or stressed. Evidence may include:

  • Text messages or emails showing threats, control, or harassment
  • Police reports or 911 calls
  • Medical records
  • Witness declarations
  • Photos of injuries or property damage
  • Testimony from therapists, teachers, or family members
  • Journal entries or logs documenting the abuse
  • Evidence of your child witnessing or reacting to the abuse

If the abuse occurred in front of your children or negatively impacted their well-being, that is especially relevant. Courts are increasingly aware of how domestic violence harms children, even if they are not directly targeted.

What Happens at the DVRO Hearing?

After the temporary order is granted, a formal evidentiary hearing is scheduled—usually within 21 days. Both parties can:

  • Present witnesses
  • Submit exhibits
  • Cross-examine the other party
  • Testify under oath

This hearing functions like a mini-trial. The judge will decide whether to issue a permanent restraining order (typically lasting 1 to 5 years) and whether to grant or modify custody and visitation orders accordingly.

If the restrained party fails to appear, the court can proceed without them.

Can a DVRO Be Used Defensively?

Yes. In some high-conflict divorces, both parties may file competing DVROs. Sometimes, the alleged abuser attempts to “get ahead” by filing first. Other times, the accused parent may feel the allegations are exaggerated or false.

In these situations, courts are careful to evaluate:

  • Who initiated contact

  • Whether there is a genuine threat of harm

  • Whether the allegations are supported by credible evidence

  • Whether the protective order is being used as a litigation weapon

If you’ve been served with a DVRO that you believe is unjustified, you need immediate legal representation to protect your rights and defend your parental relationship.

What If the Court Denies the DVRO?

Even if your request is denied, the act of filing may provide documentation of concerns, a paper trail of attempts to establish safety, and evidence of prior conflict. You may still be able to pursue:

  • Custody modifications
  • Supervised visitation for the other parent
  • Orders for counseling or parenting classes
  • Protective provisions in a custody judgment (e.g., non-disparagement clauses, no-alcohol conditions, third-party exchanges)

In some cases, if the DVRO is denied, the judge may still order Family Court Services mediation, a 730 evaluation, or other assessments to resolve ongoing concerns.

Final Thoughts

Domestic violence and custody are deeply intertwined in California family law. A well-documented, lawfully obtained Domestic Violence Restraining Order can do more than protect your physical safety—it can help secure legal and physical custody, provide stability for your children, and give you a strong foundation as you navigate divorce or co-parenting.

That said, the process is not simple, and it can be emotionally and legally complex. Filing for a DVRO—especially alongside a custody request—requires preparation, clarity, and legal strategy.

At Minella Law Group, we help survivors of abuse protect themselves and their children with skill, compassion, and precision. Whether you’re seeking protection or defending against false claims, we understand the nuances of these cases and the lasting impact they have on families.

 

If You Need Protection, Don’t Wait. We’re Here to Help.

 

If you’re in danger or concerned about your child’s safety, a Domestic Violence Restraining Order may be the first step toward reclaiming control and securing custody.

📞 Call Minella Law Group today at 619-289-7948 to schedule a confidential consultation with one of our family law specialists. We’ll listen to your concerns, assess the situation, and create a clear strategy tailored to your goals.

📝 Prefer email? Fill out our online contact form and a member of our legal team will get in touch with you promptly.

We’ll help you protect what matters most—your safety, your children, and your future.

 

 

In Child Support

Navigating 2025 California Child Support Laws

In the intricate tapestry of family law, few matters carry as much significance as child support. It is a legal obligation that transcends financial transactions, intertwining the lives of parents and the well-being of their children.

In 2025, the landscape of child support undergoes profound transformations, shaped by legislative amendments that prioritize fairness, transparency, and the dynamic needs of modern families.

 

Understanding Child Support

Child support is a legal obligation that ensures both parents contribute financially to the well-being of their children, even if they are not living together. The primary purpose of child support is to provide for the child’s basic needs, including food, shelter, clothing, education, and healthcare. It is a fundamental aspect of family law designed to safeguard the best interests of the child and promote financial stability within separated or divorced families.

Child support is not merely a legal obligation; it is a commitment to the future of our children. The intricacies of these obligations have been further refined through critical revisions to California’s Child Support Guidelines in 2024. This guide aims to unravel the intricacies of these changes, empowering both custodial and non-custodial parents with the knowledge to navigate the evolving system effectively.

 

What Needs to be Disclosed to Calculate Child Support

Calculating child support involves a detailed examination of both parents’ financial situations to determine a fair and equitable contribution. Various factors are taken into account, and disclosure of specific information is crucial for an accurate assessment. Key elements that need to be disclosed include:

Income: Both parents are required to disclose their income, encompassing wages, bonuses, investments, and any other sources of financial gain. Net disposable income, after mandatory deductions such as taxes and health insurance premiums, is typically considered for a more accurate reflection of available resources.

Employment Information: Details about employment, including job stability and any changes in employment status, are essential. This information helps in understanding the reliability of income sources.

Assets and Liabilities: A comprehensive overview of assets, such as real estate, vehicles, and financial accounts, is necessary. Additionally, any outstanding debts or liabilities may impact the overall financial picture.

Living Expenses: Understanding the living expenses of both parents is vital. This includes rent or mortgage payments, utilities, and other regular expenditures that may affect the ability to contribute to child support.

Custody Arrangements: The custody arrangement plays a significant role in determining child support. The amount of time each parent spends with the child can impact the financial obligations.

Special Needs and Extraordinary Expenses: If a child has special needs or requires additional financial support for extracurricular activities, education, or healthcare, these factors should be disclosed for a more accurate calculation.

Full and honest disclosure is crucial in ensuring that child support orders are fair and representative of the parents’ financial capacities. Failure to provide accurate information can lead to legal consequences and may undermine the well-being of the child.

 

Processes for Obtaining Child Support

Obtaining child support typically involves several steps within the legal system. While the specifics may vary by jurisdiction, the general process includes:

Filing a Petition:

The custodial parent initiates the process by filing a petition for child support with the family court or the California Department of Child Support Services (DCSS). This document outlines the details of the case, including information about the child, the custodial and non-custodial parents, and the requested child support amount.

Service of Process:

The non-custodial parent is officially notified of the child support proceedings through a legal process known as “service of process.” This ensures that the non-custodial parent is aware of the legal action and has an opportunity to respond.

Response and Financial Disclosure:

The non-custodial parent is given an opportunity to respond to the petition, providing their financial information and addressing any concerns. Both parents may be required to complete financial affidavits or disclose relevant documentation.

Mediation or Court Hearings:

In some cases, parents may be encouraged to participate in mediation to reach an agreement on child support terms. If an agreement is not reached, the case may proceed to a court hearing, where a judge will consider the evidence and make a determination on child support.

Child Support Order:

If an agreement is reached or the court makes a decision, a child support order is issued. This order specifies the amount of child support to be paid, the schedule for payments, and any other relevant terms.

Enforcement:

If the non-custodial parent fails to comply with the child support order, enforcement measures may be taken. These can include wage garnishment, property liens, suspension of licenses, and other legal actions to ensure compliance.

It’s important for both parents to engage in the process with transparency and a focus on the best interests of the child. Seeking legal advice and assistance, particularly from family law attorneys, can help navigate the complexities of child support proceedings and ensure a fair resolution.

 

2025 Adjusted Income Guidelines

California’s Child Support Guidelines are undergoing crucial revisions to create a fairer system for calculating child support payments. These adjustments are significant and can impact the amount of support you’re either entitled to receive or obligated to pay.

The revised guidelines take a more nuanced approach to income calculation, considering both parties’ net disposable incomes. This involves calculating actual take-home pay after mandatory deductions. The updated income brackets include widening ranges to account for the high cost of living in various areas of California. Distinctions are made between different regions within the state, recognizing economic diversity.

Additionally, calculations now consider multiple children and the financial needs specific to each child’s age.

These adjustments aim to provide a more equitable system where child support payments align more closely with each parent’s financial capacity and the realistic needs of the children involved. It’s crucial to stay informed about these changes, as they reflect a commitment to creating a system that adapts to the dynamic nature of family structures.

 

2024 Revised Enforcement Measures

In 2024, California’s child support system undergoes not only recalibrations in the calculation of payments but also a robust enhancement of enforcement measures. The aim is to ensure that child support obligations are met promptly and fully, fostering an environment of accountability and responsibility.

Electronic Income Withholding Orders (E-IWOs)

A pivotal shift in the enforcement landscape comes with the increased prevalence of Electronic Income Withholding Orders (E-IWOs).

These orders streamline the withholding process, making it more efficient for employers to redirect owed funds directly from a parent’s paycheck to the child support agency. The move towards automation serves to reduce errors and accelerates the transfer of payments, ensuring that children receive the necessary support without unnecessary delays.

Integrated Database for Tracking Payments

To enhance transparency and tracking capabilities, a new integrated database is introduced. This database is designed to closely monitor payment patterns, providing real-time tracking of child support transactions. Any missed or late payments trigger prompt enforcement actions.

This advanced tracking system not only minimizes the incidence of payment lags but also ensures a more proactive approach to enforcement.

Swift Intervention by Law Enforcement Agencies

The revised enforcement measures empower law enforcement agencies to intervene more quickly in cases of non-compliance. Immediate income withholding for all new and modified child support orders ensures a swift response to ensure that child support obligations are met.

This proactive approach is aimed at minimizing delays and ensuring that children receive the support they are entitled to without undue hardship.

Advanced Tracking Systems Triggering Enforcement Actions

Advanced tracking systems are implemented to closely monitor payment patterns and automatically trigger enforcement actions. If a parent consistently falls behind on payments or fails to meet their child support duties, these systems enable quicker responses. The goal is to address non-compliance promptly and take appropriate measures to ensure that financial support is provided for the well-being of the child.

Additional Powers Granted to the California Department of Child Support Services

The California Department of Child Support Services is granted additional powers to enforce compliance. This includes the authority to place liens on property and bank accounts to collect overdue child support. In practical terms, this means that if a parent falls behind on payments, the state can take legal action by making a claim against their assets until the debt is settled. This added enforcement measure serves as a significant deterrent against non-compliance.

Consequences for Persistent Non-Compliance

Persistent non-compliance with child support obligations can lead to more severe consequences.

The revised enforcement measures include the possibility of license suspension or being barred from certain government benefits for parents who consistently neglect their child support duties. These consequences emphasize the seriousness with which non-payment issues are treated under the updated laws.

A Balancing Act

While the focus remains on creating a supportive environment for both parents and children, the revised enforcement measures strike a balance by taking non-payment issues more seriously than ever before. By minimizing the exploitation of loopholes and upholding the rights of children to financial support, these measures aim to reinforce the idea that supporting one’s child is not just a legal obligation but a moral and societal responsibility. The changes are designed to foster compliance, accountability, and, ultimately, the best interests of the child.

Impact on Custodial Parents

The 2024 changes have significant implications for custodial parents, affecting how support payments are received. With the introduction of E-IWOs, income withholding becomes automated, resulting in more punctual payments. The integrated database monitors payment patterns in real-time, offering increased transparency and triggering enforcement actions promptly

The intended benefits for custodial parents include improved payment regularity, reduced administrative burden, enhanced enforcement support, and less personal involvement in collection efforts. These changes aim to alleviate financial challenges and ensure the child’s welfare remains a top priority.

Impact on Non-Custodial Parents

Non-custodial parents will experience a shift in how child support payments are processed and enforced. The introduction of E-IWOs streamlines the withholding process, ensuring prompt and consistent payments. The new integrated payment database accurately tracks financial contributions, reducing the chance of disputes over payment histories.

Non-compliant payers should be mindful of stringent enforcement actions, including garnishment of wages, property seizure, license suspension, and possible jail time. Proactive engagement with the California Department of Child Support Services is crucial to avoiding these measures, especially in cases of financial hardship

 

Changes in Child Support Add-Ons Allocation: A Closer Look

In the ever-evolving landscape of family law, one of the significant amendments to child support statutes pertains to the allocation of add-ons. Beyond the basic support provided for the child’s day-to-day needs, child support add-ons play a crucial role in addressing specific, often unavoidable, additional expenses that contribute to a child’s overall welfare. These add-ons go beyond the standard child support amount and are designed to cover essential elements that may not be included in the basic calculation.

  1. Uninsured Medical Expenses:

One significant category of child support add-ons involves uninsured medical expenses. These include healthcare costs that are not covered by insurance, such as co-pays, deductibles, and medical treatments that may fall outside the scope of regular insurance coverage. Children often require medical attention beyond routine check-ups, and these add-ons ensure that both parents contribute to covering these unforeseen or non-insured medical expenses.

  1. Childcare Costs:

Childcare is another crucial aspect addressed by child support add-ons. The costs associated with childcare, including daycare expenses or costs related to babysitters or after-school programs, are considered add-ons. Recognizing that parents may need assistance in covering the expenses associated with ensuring the child’s care and supervision, these add-ons aim to distribute the financial responsibility fairly between both parents.

  1. Educational Expenses:

Educational expenses, such as school fees, extracurricular activities, and tutoring, are also covered by child support add-ons. Education plays a vital role in a child’s development, and these expenses are considered essential for their growth and enrichment. The allocation of funds for educational purposes ensures that both parents contribute to providing a well-rounded learning experience for the child.

  1. Special Needs:

Children with special needs may incur additional expenses related to their unique requirements. Child support add-ons take into account the extra costs associated with medical care, therapy, adaptive equipment, or any other necessities specific to the child’s condition. These add-ons acknowledge the diverse needs of children and aim to provide adequate financial support to meet those needs.

  1. Extracurricular Activities:

Participation in extracurricular activities, such as sports, arts, or other enrichment programs, is encouraged for a child’s overall development. Child support add-ons may cover the costs associated with these activities, ensuring that both parents contribute to providing opportunities that go beyond the basic necessities and contribute to a child’s personal and social growth.

 

Current Law and Customary Practice:

Under the previous legal framework, the customary practice for allocating add-ons, such as uncovered medical expenses and childcare costs, leaned towards an equal division of 50% between both parties. While this approach provided a standardized method, an alternative option existed, allowing the allocation to be based on the parties’ relative net incomes.

New Law:

In September 1, 2024, a transformative change will be implemented through Family Code Section 4061(a), reshaping the approach to child support add-ons allocation. The new law states that these add-ons shall now be apportioned according to the parties’ relative net incomes, unless a specific request for an alternative allocation is made or the court determines a different division. 

This means it can be 90/10, 80/20, or whatever the breakdown is. The point is that for the first time we have an option to deviate from 50/50.  

Breaking down the process further, Section 4061(b) delineates the steps involved in computing child support and addressing any spousal support. Firstly, child support is calculated, and any spousal support ordered is subtracted from the payor’s gross income and added to the payee’s gross income. Following this, any child support ordered is subtracted from the payor’s net income but not added to the payee’s income.

Implications of the New Allocation Approach

This shift in allocation methodology holds profound implications for parents navigating child support proceedings.

By tying the allocation of add-ons to the parties’ relative net incomes, the new law aims to create a more equitable distribution that reflects the financial capacity of each parent accurately. This move recognizes the diverse economic circumstances of parents and ensures that the financial responsibilities associated with add-ons are proportionate to their individual abilities to contribute.

Navigating the Changes

As parents adapt to these changes, it becomes imperative to stay informed about the nuances of the new allocation approach. Understanding the intricacies of computing child support, considering spousal support, and recognizing the implications on net incomes are crucial steps in navigating the evolving landscape of child support laws.

 

Managing Child Support Under the 2024 Changes

Navigating the complexities of child support under these changes requires attention to detail and proactive engagement. Familiarize yourself with E-IWOs, leverage the integrated payment database, and stay proactive to avoid enforcement actions. Communication with the California Department of Child Support Services is vital to staying in good standing and ensuring timely support for your children’s education, healthcare, and general welfare.

Adapting quickly to the updated California child support laws in 2025 contributes positively to your child’s well-being and future. Embrace the new systems, stay informed, and fulfill your responsibilities to provide the best for your children.

 

For more information or to schedule an appointment, call us at (619) 289-7948. We look forward to helping you.

In Divorce

Tracing Separate Property in Divorce: How to Prove What’s Yours

estate planning

In California divorces, determining whether an asset is community or separate property can have major financial consequences. The distinction directly impacts whether the asset must be split with your spouse or retained as your own. One of the most important tools for protecting separate property in a divorce is the process known as “tracing.”

Tracing is the method by which a party demonstrates that a particular asset—or portion of an asset—can be clearly and convincingly identified as their separate property. This becomes especially critical in high-asset divorces, where investments, real estate, businesses, and retirement accounts may have been acquired or grown during the marriage but contain separate property origins.

This blog breaks down what tracing is, when it’s necessary, how it works under California law, and what you can do to strengthen your case if you need to prove that something is rightfully and exclusively yours.

Understanding the Basics: Community vs. Separate Property

California is a community property state, meaning that any property acquired during the marriage is presumed to belong equally to both spouses. However, there are important exceptions.

Separate property includes:

  • Property acquired before the date of marriage

  • Property received as an inheritance

  • Assets obtained through gifts to one spouse only

  • Proceeds from separate property, provided they’re kept separate

  • Property designated as separate via a valid prenuptial or postnuptial agreement

While the rules may seem straightforward, the real challenge arises when separate and community funds have been commingled—or mixed—in a way that makes ownership unclear. That’s where tracing comes in.

What Is Tracing in Divorce?

Tracing refers to the legal and forensic process of tracking the origin and path of assets to prove that they were initially, and remain, separate property—despite coming into contact with community property.

California courts require clear, credible evidence to support separate property claims. Simply asserting, “That house was mine before we married” is not enough. You must show:

  1. The source of the funds used to acquire or grow the asset

  2. That the funds or asset remained segregated or identifiable

  3. That you did not transmute the asset (i.e., change it into community property by intent or action)

If you can’t trace it, you risk losing it—or having it split in divorce.

Common Situations Where Tracing Is Required

Tracing is necessary in a wide range of divorce scenarios, including:

Real Estate Purchased Before Marriage but Paid Off During Marriage

If you bought a home before marriage, it’s initially separate property. But if the mortgage was paid down with community funds during the marriage, the community may have acquired an interest in the equity—especially under the Moore/Marsden rule (explained below).

Inheritance or Gift Received During the Marriage

Inheritance is considered separate property. But if you deposited that money into a joint account and then used it for shared expenses, you may need to trace it to reclaim it.

Business Started Before Marriage

If you owned a business before marriage but continued operating it during the marriage, the community may be entitled to a share of its growth unless you can trace the value back to separate sources.

Investment Accounts and Retirement Plans

Stocks, crypto, and retirement accounts often mix premarital and marital contributions. Tracing is necessary to isolate what portion of the account remains separate.

Methods of Tracing: Direct vs. Indirect

There are two primary methods for tracing separate property in California: direct tracing and family expense tracing (also called indirect tracing).

Direct Tracing

Direct tracing involves showing that a specific asset was purchased with separate funds and remained separate throughout. This requires:

  • Detailed financial records (e.g., bank statements, wire transfers, checks)
  • Proof that separate funds were used
  • No commingling with community funds
  • Clear intent to keep the asset separate

Example: You inherited $100,000 from your parent and used it to buy a rental property. You kept the inheritance in a separate account and used it directly for the down payment. You did not add your spouse’s name to the deed or use joint funds for improvements. This asset may be successfully traced and confirmed as separate property.

Family Expense Tracing (Indirect Tracing)

This method is used when separate and community funds have been combined. It assumes that community funds are spent on family expenses first, leaving separate property intact.

Example: You deposited an inheritance into a joint bank account. Over time, the community spent money on groceries, vacations, and bills. You then used remaining funds to buy a car. You may argue that the remaining funds were your separate property because community expenses depleted the community portion.

This method is more complicated and may require expert testimony from a forensic accountant.

The Moore/Marsden Rule: Mixed Real Estate Contributions

When one spouse purchases a home before marriage (or with separate funds), but community property is later used to pay down the mortgage, the Moore/Marsden formula is used to determine each party’s interest in the home.

The rule allows the community estate to gain an interest in the property proportionate to the amount of principal reduction made with community funds. The appreciating value is then shared based on that ratio.

Example:

  • You bought a home before marriage for $400,000

  • During the marriage, community funds paid off $100,000 of principal
  • The house is now worth $800,000

Using Moore/Marsden, your spouse may claim a share of the appreciation tied to that $100,000, even though your name is on title.

A proper tracing analysis can reduce or limit that claim.

What Happens If You Can’t Trace the Asset?

If you’re unable to trace the asset back to a separate property source with clear and convincing evidence, the court will presume it is community property. This means:

  • You may have to split the asset with your ex

  • You could lose the full value of an inheritance, premarital investment, or business

  • You may be ordered to pay out 50% of something that was originally yours

In high-net-worth divorces, this can mean hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars lost due to poor documentation.

Tracing Best Practices

If you have any asset that you believe is separate property, follow these best practices to strengthen your claim:

  • Keep separate property in separate accounts

  • Avoid commingling inheritance or premarital funds with joint money

  • Maintain copies of bank records, title documents, and contracts

  • Consult a forensic accountant early in the divorce

  • Identify assets that may require tracing during your initial disclosures

  • Consider filing a preliminary tracing report to preserve your claims

  • Avoid transferring or retitling assets during separation

Working with a lawyer experienced in asset division can help ensure your tracing strategy is properly documented and presented.

Tracing and Settlement Strategy

In many divorces, tracing becomes a powerful negotiation tool. You may choose to:

  • Waive certain claims in exchange for other assets
  • Use strong tracing evidence to justify keeping 100% of a disputed asset
  • Agree to a reduced split of an asset that’s only partially traceable
  • Offer a buyout based on traced vs. untraced percentages

These discussions are best handled with the support of your legal team and financial expert. A well-executed tracing claim can significantly improve your net result in property division.

When to Bring in a Forensic Accountant

If your case involves any of the following, consider hiring a forensic accountant:

  • Large commingled accounts
  • Long marriage with complex financial history
  • Business ownership with separate and community contributions
  • Real estate purchased before marriage but used by both spouses
  • Mixed investment portfolios or retirement plans

These experts can trace transactions across years, prepare expert reports for court, and testify on your behalf. Their findings can make or break a case involving valuable assets.

Final Thoughts

Tracing separate property is one of the most effective—but often underused—strategies in California divorce. If you received an inheritance, owned a business, or bought property before your marriage, you may have the legal right to keep it. But without proper tracing, you risk losing it to the community pot.

Don’t wait until court to protect your assets. Be proactive, organized, and strategic with your tracing claims.

At Minella Law Group, we specialize in high-asset divorce and have extensive experience helping clients trace and protect their separate property. Whether through negotiation or litigation, we can help ensure you keep what’s rightfully yours.

 

Need Help Proving an Asset Is Separate Property?

📞 Call Minella Law Group today at 619-289-7948 to schedule a confidential consultation with one of our family law specialists. We’ll listen to your concerns, assess the situation, and create a clear strategy tailored to your goals.

📝 Prefer email? Fill out our online contact form and a member of our legal team will get in touch with you promptly.

Our team is ready to guide you through the tracing process and fight for the financial outcome you deserve.

In Child Custody & Visitation

When Parallel Parenting Is the Only Option: Legal Strategies for High-Conflict Custody Cases

child custody high earner

For many divorced or separated parents, the goal of co-parenting is to maintain a respectful, communicative relationship for the benefit of their children. But in high-conflict custody cases, that goal can quickly become unrealistic—if not outright harmful. In these situations, parallel parenting may be the only viable path forward.

Parallel parenting is a structured parenting arrangement specifically designed for parents who cannot communicate effectively or peacefully. It minimizes contact between parents while allowing both to remain active in their children’s lives. While this approach may seem cold or impersonal, it is often the safest and most stable solution for families entrenched in conflict, particularly when ongoing communication triggers emotional or verbal abuse.

In California family law, the courts are increasingly familiar with and receptive to parallel parenting plans in high-conflict cases. Judges recognize that constant parental conflict is more damaging to children than lack of parental coordination. This article explores what parallel parenting is, when it becomes necessary, how it differs from traditional co-parenting, and the legal tools available to support and enforce it in high-conflict custody situations.

What Is Parallel Parenting?

Parallel parenting is a legal and psychological strategy for managing custody and visitation between parents who cannot co-parent due to ongoing hostility, domestic violence, or toxic communication patterns. Unlike cooperative co-parenting—which requires mutual respect, joint decision-making, and frequent communication—parallel parenting reduces contact to a minimum and compartmentalizes each parent’s role during their respective parenting time.

In a parallel parenting plan, each parent is responsible for the child during their own custodial time. There is little or no direct communication between the parents. Instead, communication is typically limited to a parenting app, a court-approved messaging platform, or written summaries. Each parent may handle medical appointments, school responsibilities, and extracurricular activities independently unless the court order requires coordination on specific issues.

The key goals of parallel parenting are to reduce the child’s exposure to conflict and to allow both parents to maintain a relationship with the child without ongoing litigation or emotional warfare.

When Is Parallel Parenting Appropriate?

California family courts often consider parallel parenting when there is evidence of chronic parental conflict that cannot be resolved through mediation or traditional co-parenting models. Common triggers for parallel parenting orders include:

  • A history of domestic violence or restraining orders between the parents
  • Repeated failures to communicate effectively or respectfully
  • Harassment, stalking, or emotionally abusive behavior
  • Allegations of parental alienation or psychological manipulation
  • Excessive litigation, including multiple modification requests
  • An inability to agree on even basic parenting decisions, such as schooling or medical care

Parallel parenting is especially effective when the parents’ relationship is highly adversarial but both parents are individually capable of providing a safe and nurturing environment for the child during their custodial time.

Courts will typically not impose parallel parenting simply because the parents don’t get along. There must be evidence that the conflict is harming the child or interfering with the child’s stability. Judges look for patterns of communication breakdowns, hostile exchanges, or litigation abuse that suggest co-parenting would be ineffective or harmful.

How Parallel Parenting Protects Children

Children suffer when they are exposed to parental conflict. Studies show that high-conflict divorces and custody disputes are among the most damaging experiences for children’s emotional and psychological health. Yelling, sarcasm, manipulation, and undermining between parents can cause anxiety, depression, behavioral problems, and difficulty forming secure attachments.

Parallel parenting aims to shield the child from this conflict by:

  • Reducing direct interaction between parents
  • Establishing clear, predictable routines
  • Providing the child with uninterrupted time with each parent
  • Preventing children from being used as messengers or emotional pawns
  • Limiting opportunities for confrontation or emotional escalation

By reducing the emotional temperature in the parenting relationship, children are given space to build independent relationships with both parents without being caught in the crossfire.

Legal Strategies for Establishing a Parallel Parenting Plan

If you are involved in a high-conflict custody case in California and believe that parallel parenting is the only workable solution, you can take proactive legal steps to request and structure this arrangement. A skilled family law attorney can help you prepare the evidence and arguments needed to persuade the court.

The first step is to request a custody and visitation order that reflects the structure of parallel parenting. This may include:

  • Detailed parenting schedules with minimal ambiguity
  • Restrictions on direct communication between parents
  • Orders limiting communication to court-approved apps such as OurFamilyWizard or TalkingParents
  • Clear exchanges of responsibility for decision-making, school involvement, and medical care
  • Neutral, third-party monitored exchanges (such as custody exchanges at school or in a public place)
  • Provisions barring the use of the child as a messenger

Courts are more likely to approve a parallel parenting plan when it is well-documented and focused on the child’s best interests. The judge must see that the goal is not to “shut out” the other parent, but to provide a conflict-free parenting structure that promotes stability.

Court-Ordered Communication Tools

In parallel parenting cases, California family courts often require the use of structured communication platforms to document interactions and reduce volatility. These tools include:

  • OurFamilyWizard: A court-approved app that tracks messages, calendars, expenses, and medical information. All communication is logged and time-stamped, which discourages inappropriate language or manipulation.
  • TalkingParents: Another widely used platform that offers secure messaging, timestamped records, and options for call recordings and document sharing.
  • Email-only or messaging-only orders: In extreme cases, the court may restrict parents to email-only contact, often through a monitored or court-accessible address.

Using these platforms creates a neutral, documented environment where communication is focused strictly on the child, not the parents’ emotional history.

Dealing With Decision-Making in Parallel Parenting

One of the biggest challenges in parallel parenting is managing joint legal custody. In California, legal custody typically refers to the right to make decisions about the child’s education, medical care, and general welfare. If the parents cannot communicate effectively, joint legal custody becomes difficult.

In a parallel parenting arrangement, the court may:

  • Divide decision-making authority by domain (e.g., one parent handles education, the other handles health)
  • Grant one parent tie-breaking authority
  • Require mediation before either parent can make certain types of decisions
  • Temporarily assign sole legal custody to one parent for specific issues

If you’re seeking or responding to a request for parallel parenting, your attorney should raise these issues clearly in pleadings or during the custody mediation process.

Modifying an Existing Order to Parallel Parenting

If you already have a custody order in place and circumstances have changed due to escalating conflict, you may request a modification based on a material change in circumstances. Evidence that supports this request includes:

  • Documented hostile communication between parents
  • Failure to comply with existing court orders
  • Multiple return-to-court motions over parenting disputes
  • Therapist, teacher, or evaluator recommendations that conflict is harming the child
  • Statements from the child (if age-appropriate and permitted by the court)

California courts are generally open to modifying custody and visitation orders when doing so serves the child’s health, safety, and welfare. If you can show that a parallel parenting arrangement will reduce conflict and better support the child’s development, the court may agree.

Parallel Parenting and Domestic Violence Cases

Parallel parenting is often essential in cases involving a history of domestic violence. If one parent has a Domestic Violence Restraining Order (DVRO) against the other, the court is likely to severely restrict communication and decision-making. In these cases, parallel parenting allows the parents to follow the custody order without violating restraining orders or endangering one another.

In fact, California Family Code §3044 creates a legal presumption against awarding custody to a parent who has committed domestic violence against the other parent or the child. If the court makes findings under this section, it may impose a parallel parenting plan with one parent having more control over certain decisions.

The court’s priority is ensuring the child is not exposed to further violence, manipulation, or intimidation. Parallel parenting provides a structure that aligns with these safety goals while maintaining the non-offending parent’s right to custody and visitation.

Can Parallel Parenting Ever Transition Back to Co-Parenting?

In some cases, yes. Parallel parenting is not always a permanent solution. If the conflict de-escalates over time, parents may gradually move back toward cooperative co-parenting. This usually happens when:

  • Both parents complete co-parenting or communication counseling
  • Trust begins to rebuild, often through the help of therapists or mediators
  • Children reach milestones (e.g., entering middle school or high school) where coordination becomes more necessary

If you’re interested in transitioning out of parallel parenting, you may file a request to modify the custody order based on changed circumstances. However, this should only be done when both parents are truly ready to reduce restrictions and work together in a respectful, child-focused manner.

Final Thoughts

Parallel parenting is not a failure—it is a powerful, structured solution for high-conflict families who want to prioritize their child’s well-being. While it may not have the warmth or flexibility of traditional co-parenting, it often brings far more stability and peace, especially for children who have been exposed to chronic parental conflict.

If you’re stuck in a toxic co-parenting relationship and concerned that it’s hurting your child, you’re not alone—and you have legal options. At Minella Law Group, we help parents in San Diego navigate high-conflict custody disputes and advocate for structured parenting plans that reduce harm, protect parental rights, and support children’s long-term development.

 

Let’s Build the Right Parenting Plan for Your Family

If you believe parallel parenting is the only viable path forward, our experienced family law attorneys can help. Whether you’re seeking to establish a new custody order or modify an existing one, we’ll guide you through the legal strategy with clarity, empathy, and precision.

📞 Call Minella Law Group today at 619-289-7948 to schedule a confidential consultation with one of our family law specialists. We’ll listen to your concerns, assess the situation, and create a clear strategy tailored to your goals.

📝 Prefer email? Fill out our online contact form and a member of our legal team will get in touch with you promptly.

In Domestic Violence Restraining Orders

False Domestic Violence Claims in Divorce: Legal Remedies and Reputational Defense

3-top-divorce-faq

Divorce can be one of the most emotionally charged events in a person’s life—and when custody, money, and pride are at stake, it’s not uncommon for one party to resort to extreme measures. Unfortunately, in some contested California divorce and custody cases, individuals make false claims of domestic violence in an attempt to gain the upper hand.

False allegations can be devastating. A restraining order—especially a temporary one—can immediately affect your custody rights, reputation, and ability to remain in your home. In some cases, you may even be forced out of your residence, cut off from your children, and required to defend yourself in a court of law with little notice. The stigma of being labeled an abuser can linger long after the accusation is disproven.

If you are facing false domestic violence allegations during divorce or custody litigation in California, you are not alone—and you are not without recourse. This blog explains what to expect, how the courts handle these cases, and what legal strategies you can use to defend your rights and reputation.

Why False Allegations Are Made

Most people do not fabricate domestic violence allegations. However, when false claims do occur, they’re often motivated by one or more of the following:

  • Gaining custody leverage: Since California Family Code §3044 presumes that a parent who has committed domestic violence should not have custody, an allegation can be used to try to exclude the other parent.
  • Retaining the family home: A temporary restraining order can force someone to vacate the home, allowing the accuser to stay during litigation.
  • Securing spousal support: Judges may consider abuse in determining support amounts or durations.
  • Controlling the divorce process: The stress and urgency of responding to a DVRO can shift power during the early stages of litigation.

Regardless of motivation, false allegations can have very real consequences. Courts treat every claim seriously, and even unfounded accusations require a strong and immediate legal response.

The Law: Family Code §3044 and DVROs

California Family Code §3044 creates a rebuttable presumption that a parent who has committed domestic violence should not have joint or sole custody. This presumption is powerful—it can shift the entire trajectory of a custody case. However, the presumption only applies if the court finds that domestic violence actually occurred within the past five years.

The burden then falls on the accused to rebut the presumption by showing that awarding them custody is still in the child’s best interest. This is why some litigants misuse the DVRO process: if they can secure a finding of domestic violence, they may limit the other parent’s custodial rights without a full custody hearing.

But courts are also aware of the potential for misuse. Judges are trained to assess credibility, motive, and consistency. If your case is built carefully and presented effectively, false allegations can be defeated—and in some cases, turned against the accusing party.

Immediate Effects of a False DVRO

When a restraining order is filed, a judge can issue a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) the same day without notifying you. This order can:

  • Remove you from your home

  • Bar you from contacting your children

  • Suspend visitation rights

  • Require you to surrender firearms

  • Restrict your movement and communication

This happens before you even get a chance to respond. That’s why time is of the essence. You will typically be scheduled for a hearing within 21 days. If you do not appear or fail to defend yourself, a permanent restraining order (DVRO) could be entered for up to five years.

Defending Against False Allegations

Defending against a false DVRO requires more than just saying, “I didn’t do it.” You need a strategic, evidence-based response that dismantles the accuser’s credibility and shows the court the full context. Here’s how to approach your defense:

1. Gather All Communication

Save every email, text, voicemail, and social media message between you and the accuser. These can show:

  • Lack of fear or ongoing contact by the accuser
  • Contradictory statements
  • Attempts at manipulation
  • Harassment or provocation by the accuser

Courts look for consistency in the accuser’s behavior. If they claim to be afraid of you, but their messages are casual or affectionate, that can seriously undermine their credibility.

2. Obtain Witness Statements

Friends, family, teachers, childcare providers, or coworkers may have observed your interactions with the accuser or your children. Statements from neutral third parties can be highly persuasive.

3. Secure Digital Evidence

If the incident allegedly occurred at a time or place where you have an alibi—such as phone GPS data, time-stamped emails, or surveillance footage—present it. Inconsistent timelines can raise doubt.

4. Request a Hearing and Testify

You have the right to defend yourself at the restraining order hearing. This is a formal proceeding, like a mini-trial, where both sides can present evidence, call witnesses, and cross-examine.

5. Challenge the Presumption

If the DVRO is granted, you can still rebut the Family Code §3044 presumption by:

  • Showing you did not commit abuse
  • Completing anger management or parenting classes (even if voluntary)
  • Demonstrating your parenting ability and relationship with the child
  • Providing evidence that custody with you is in the child’s best interest

Even if a DVRO is issued, it does not mean you lose custody automatically—but it does mean you need to be proactive in countering the legal presumption.

What Happens If the Court Finds the Claims Are False?

If the court determines that the allegations were knowingly false, several outcomes are possible:

  • Custody consequences for the accuser: Courts disfavor manipulation. A parent who uses false allegations to alienate or exclude the other may lose custody themselves.
  • Attorney’s fees and sanctions: California law allows for the award of attorney’s fees to a prevailing party in a DVRO proceeding. If the claim was clearly frivolous, the court may also impose sanctions.
  • Impact on credibility in the main divorce case: False claims can seriously undermine a litigant’s credibility. If they lie to the court once, judges are far less likely to believe them later—especially in contested financial or custody issues.

In extreme cases, knowingly filing a false DVRO may even lead to criminal charges for perjury or filing a false police report, though this is rare.

The Role of Minor’s Counsel and 730 Evaluations

If the case involves children and the court is uncertain about the truth, it may appoint Minor’s Counsel (a lawyer for the child) or order a 730 custody evaluation. These neutral professionals will interview the child, both parents, and other sources to assess:

  • Whether abuse occurred

  • Whether the child has been coached or alienated
  • Which parent provides the more stable and safe environment

In these cases, documentation, demeanor, and consistency matter enormously. False accusers often overreach or display controlling tendencies in interviews—something evaluators are trained to detect.

Rebuilding Custody and Reputation

If you’ve been falsely accused and lost temporary custody, all is not lost. You can petition the court to:

  • Reinstate visitation (often starting with supervised time)
  • Modify the custody orders once the DVRO is lifted or denied
  • Appoint reunification therapy if alienation occurred
  • Return to a shared parenting plan

Courts aim to preserve parent-child relationships whenever possible. If you can demonstrate that the false allegation damaged that bond—and that you are acting in good faith to rebuild it—judges will take notice.

Final Thoughts

False domestic violence allegations are a tragic misuse of a system designed to protect. But they can be fought—and disproven—with diligence, strategy, and experienced legal guidance. The key is not to panic, but to respond swiftly, gather evidence, and trust the process.

At Minella Law Group, we’ve successfully defended parents against false accusations and restored custody, credibility, and peace of mind. We also help ensure that legitimate claims of abuse are taken seriously and prosecuted appropriately—because we believe in protecting both the innocent and the vulnerable.

 

Accused Falsely? Don’t Wait to Defend Yourself.

If you’re facing false allegations of domestic violence during divorce or custody litigation, you need a legal team that knows how to respond with strength and precision.

📞 Call Minella Law Group today at 619-289-7948 to schedule a confidential consultation with one of our family law specialists. We’ll listen to your concerns, assess the situation, and create a clear strategy tailored to your goals.

📝 Prefer email? Fill out our online contact form and a member of our legal team will get in touch with you promptly.

Your rights, your reputation, and your relationship with your children are worth defending—let us help you protect them.